Modified by ChatGPT for migration to microRecticulum_Firmware, not verified by me... yet, but I am preserving to document this stage.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1be5b59c7a
commit
432f17b2be
12 changed files with 188 additions and 162 deletions
|
|
@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ so this repo consumes existing T-Beam SUPREME integration instead of duplicating
|
|||
- integration paths (from `microReticulum_Firmware`)
|
||||
6. After parity validation, remove or archive `external/microReticulum`.
|
||||
|
||||
Step-2 inventory output:
|
||||
- `docs/microreticulum_firmware_step2_adoption_matrix.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation Checklist
|
||||
- Build passes for all key exercises.
|
||||
- SD/RTC/GPS startup behavior remains stable.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
62
docs/microreticulum_firmware_step2_adoption_matrix.md
Normal file
62
docs/microreticulum_firmware_step2_adoption_matrix.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
# Step 2 Adoption Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
Repository: `microReticulumTbeam`
|
||||
Submodule source: `external/microReticulum_Firmware`
|
||||
|
||||
## What Step 2 Means
|
||||
Identify and wire the first low-risk points where this repo should consume existing board-integration logic from `microReticulum_Firmware`, instead of maintaining duplicate local assumptions.
|
||||
|
||||
## High-Value Upstream Sources
|
||||
- `external/microReticulum_Firmware/Boards.h`
|
||||
- T-Beam Supreme pin map and feature flags.
|
||||
- Includes SD pins (`SD_CS=47`, `SD_CLK=36`, `SD_MISO=37`, `SD_MOSI=35`), PMU I2C pins (`I2C_SDA=42`, `I2C_SCL=41`), LoRa pins.
|
||||
- `external/microReticulum_Firmware/Power.h`
|
||||
- AXP2101 setup sequence for T-Beam Supreme (`BOARD_TBEAM_S_V1`), including SD rail (BLDO1), ALDO rails, charging config.
|
||||
- `external/microReticulum_Firmware/platformio.ini`
|
||||
- `env:ttgo-t-beam-supreme` build model and dependency pattern.
|
||||
|
||||
## Local Targets And First Consumers
|
||||
1. `firmware/fieldtest_beacon/src/main.cpp`
|
||||
- Why first: this is the integration entry point, not just a smoke test.
|
||||
- Step-2 change made: SD CS now comes from `Boards.h` instead of hardcoded `10`.
|
||||
|
||||
2. `exercises/04_SD_card/src/main.cpp`
|
||||
- Why second: duplicates PMU + SD pin assumptions already present upstream.
|
||||
- Planned consume-first item: PMU rail setup pattern from `Power.h`.
|
||||
|
||||
3. `exercises/05_SD_Card_Watcher/src/main.cpp`
|
||||
- Why third: extends `04` and should share the same PMU/pin source strategy.
|
||||
- Planned consume-first item: same board/power source as `04`.
|
||||
|
||||
4. `exercises/06_RTC_check/src/main.cpp`
|
||||
- Why fourth: depends on PMU + I2C pin assumptions that overlap upstream.
|
||||
- Planned consume-first item: board I2C pin source and PMU readiness sequence.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Wiring Done
|
||||
- Added submodule:
|
||||
- `external/microReticulum_Firmware`
|
||||
- Wired one concrete consumer:
|
||||
- `firmware/fieldtest_beacon/src/main.cpp` now includes `Boards.h` and uses `SD_CS`.
|
||||
- `firmware/fieldtest_beacon/platformio.ini` now includes `external/microReticulum_Firmware` headers and sets `BOARD_MODEL=BOARD_TBEAM_S_V1`.
|
||||
- Added local adapter:
|
||||
- `shared/boards/tbeam_supreme_adapter.h`
|
||||
- Exposes board pins and PMU setup based on upstream T-Beam Supreme definitions.
|
||||
- Refactored exercises to consume adapter:
|
||||
- `exercises/04_SD_card`
|
||||
- `exercises/05_SD_Card_Watcher`
|
||||
- `exercises/06_RTC_check`
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation Status
|
||||
- `firmware/fieldtest_beacon` now builds after adding required deps:
|
||||
- `ArduinoJson` 7.x
|
||||
- `MsgPack`
|
||||
- `Crypto` (provides `Ed25519.h` and `Curve25519.h`)
|
||||
- `exercises/04_SD_card` builds.
|
||||
- `exercises/05_SD_Card_Watcher` builds.
|
||||
- `exercises/06_RTC_check` builds.
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Step Candidate
|
||||
Reduce macro redefinition warnings emitted by `Boards.h` in adapter consumers:
|
||||
- Option A: small local board-map header with only required constants copied from upstream board model.
|
||||
- Option B: upstream contribution to make board capability macros conditional/override-safe.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue