flows/ documents end-to-end chronological narratives for common Reticulum operations, complementing SPEC.md (which is organized by protocol layer). Each step cross-references the SPEC.md section that defines the wire bytes, so the directory introduces no new normative claims. First flow: send-opportunistic-lxmf.md walks the 13-step sequence from LXMRouter.handle_outbound through LXMessage.pack, the path-request preamble, Token encryption, Transport.outbound HEADER_1→HEADER_2 conversion, and per-interface KISS/HDLC framing. Pinned against RNS 1.2.0 / LXMF 0.9.6 with file+line citations for each step. README.md updated to advertise flows/ and tools/ alongside SPEC.md and test-vectors/. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| README.md | ||
| send-opportunistic-lxmf.md | ||
Flows
End-to-end chronological narratives for common Reticulum operations. Where SPEC.md is organized by layer (identity, header, token crypto, announce, LXMF, link, transport, framing), the documents here are organized by operation and walk through what each layer contributes in order — app-call → wire bytes.
The two views are complementary: SPEC.md tells you what each piece looks like; the flows tell you when each piece runs and what calls what. A flow document should not introduce new normative claims — every byte-level detail should be a cross-reference to the relevant SPEC.md section. If you find yourself describing wire bytes here that aren't in SPEC.md, that's a sign the spec has a gap to fill.
Status
| Flow | Status |
|---|---|
send-opportunistic-lxmf.md |
✅ |
send-link-lxmf.md (DIRECT method, over a Reticulum Link) |
⏳ |
send-propagated-lxmf.md (PROPAGATED method, via a propagation node) |
⏳ |
receive-opportunistic-lxmf.md (the inverse of the opportunistic-send flow) |
⏳ |
announce.md (build, sign, transmit, ratchet rotation) |
⏳ |
path-discovery.md (request, response, path-table population) |
⏳ |
Conventions
- Each flow targets one specific upstream operation.
send-opportunistic-lxmf.mddocuments whatLXMRouter.handle_outbound(lxm)does for an opportunistic message; it does not also cover Link or propagation paths — those get their own docs so the chronology stays linear. - Numbered steps are chronological. Each step that produces wire bytes cross-references the SPEC.md section that defines those bytes.
- Source citations use the standard
pip install rns lxmfinstall layout (RNS/,LXMF/) with file + line. Line numbers are pinned to the RNS / LXMF version named at the top of each flow; out-of-date line numbers should be fixed in a PR. - "Verified" claims must be backed by a
tools/script per../agent.md§1. Flow docs inherit the verification status of the SPEC.md sections they reference — if a flow step relies on an unverified SPEC.md callout, the flow should mark that step as inheriting the unverified status rather than silently treat it as fact.